A few months ago, I got this pleasant, surprising news from one of my colleagues from the company where I used to work as a HR consultant until March 2007. The news was about the launching of their first Corporate Social Responsibility project which was realized as their 8th year anniversary.
What made me even more surprised as well as excited was that the Philippine was chosen to be the very location of the project. They will donate classrooms to an elementary school in
Looking back, when I first joined that company, a HR management consulting firm targeting only domestic market, as a fresh college graduate, the company was just about to take its leap from their “venture” phase, experiencing incredibly rapid growth both in capital as well as numbers of employees. At that time, “expansion” and “speed” are one of those key words that would describe the atmosphere of the company, and no body, at least among those young folks, dare to take time to talk about “CSR” or about the world outside of the country, even though by that time “CSR” has been already getting attention from the society and often promoted by big corporations.
When I finally decided to leave the company to give some time for myself to see what the real world is outside, I never imagined that the day when my company will have any prospects of entering into those CSR areas will come so soon.
That’s why I had a real difficulty to link my perception of the company that I knew of to their new project in the
The project will be conducted by Plan International, a well-established international NGO on the field of education, from May to October. The company will not only cover the cost of infrastructure but also support Plan’s various activities to maintain the quality of the school.
Since I was so happy and excited about the news, I shared the story with my Filipino classmate. I knew that he has skepticism toward CSR, and it often clashed with my rather optimistic view of CSR. But even for him, the fact that a Japanese small venture company that holds technically no direct interests in the
So I tried to give him overall idea of the project. But when I first told him that project is in
“Well, maybe natural disaster---?” I answered, trying to understand his intention. Then he said, “Hummm…that can be one of the reasons, but---
Now, I got a bit better sense. In the Philippines, the poorer the region is, the bigger frustration people tend to have toward the government and that makes them more attracted to support the armed wing of the communist party, NPA (New People’s Army); The root causes of the predicament of those poor communities are not just due to the natural disaster or lack of access to the basic social services, but at times, but are also due to the violent confrontation between the government and NPA.
According to him, in the rural
“In such a difficult region, what can a Japanese company do, if they have no sense of connection to the area?”
He was kind enough not to dare to say so, but I could sense his concern--the insensitivity and egotistic nature of CSR.
I told him that the project will be undertaken by Plan International and asked if that fact makes any difference.
He then said, looking a bit relieved, “then, it will be a great project, because Plan is a really well-perceived organization by the people in the region, even by NPA.”
I was very surprised that he seemed to know so much about Plan in
Even if they successfully provide a community with fancy classrooms, without the existence of comprehensive approach based upon the real understanding and trust of people, they will eventually be abandoned because, for example, no parents can afford notebooks for their kids, or the place is too isolated to attract teachers from the town, or a powerful local politician forcibly privatizes it.
Although there is no single definition that could successfully capture all different aspects and activities of CSR, I personally think that a partnership between private companies that are rich in various resources and those NGOs that are rich in all know-how to implement sustainable project within a community realizes the best role distribution. Of course, there are actually a few legitimate reasons for some to be skeptical about it, which I will discuss about it in the next entry.
2 comments:
hi... I just discussed with the angel, and she asked me to send this discourse to you:
now days, neoclassic economy wants to prove that a free market can be formed as a long strategy in developing a social prosperity (social economy development). This approach is trying to move out from the old proposition that a market is only a demand and supply which many critical thought, including pessimism and realism, trust it as a power battle. Since it is a power battle, then, in the free market the law of Darwinism in place "the survival of the fittest". This a social fact of market. Hence, many people can not trust the concept of free market in which many big companies feel comfortable.
A constructive way in questioning the process of transforming the market as a social economy development is "how to change a power domination between the fittest and the weakest?" This question actually follows the realism-pessimism proposition above. In a practical level, then, the owner of power (means the fittest) should give up their part of power to the weakest. In Marxism thought the weakest (also named as proletariat class) should take the power, ussually power is interpreted as "means and mode of production", over from the fittest through a revolutionary way.
However the thought above also create a new crisis and domination. Giving up the part of the fittest' power is a process of inter-subjective dynamics. This proposition in one answer to the fact that a revolutionary process create a new crisis and domination. This thought is well caught by neoclassic economy...in which SAYAKO's ex-company want to share a power through CSR.
However this constructive process should be monitored by moral, open consciousness (as SAYAKO has it), and....realism-pessimism society :P
That's it what the angel said to me. She said will come to see you directly if I can't send her meassage to you :(
Latahzan :)
hey, where is the promised next entry after this?
it is true that CSR is helping communities in many respects, such as, infrastructure projects, educational projects, social services, and others. these projects are borne out of goodwill of corporations. they have no obligations or whatsoever that will make them continue to do so for a period of time. as long as they want to help, there will be numerous communities waiting for their help. there exists always a problem of sustainability.
goodwill wanes. funds can be drained. people change. but communities are always in need.
my critic about CSR is that it does not have a development framework. it provides something that it deems needed by the community. i have no problem with that. but in overall and longer impact, what does the help mean to the community?
i am glad to know that a foreign company has chosen masbate, bicol to conduct its CSR. Any help is welcome by a poor community.
Kudos to the company. Wish I could visit the site one of this day.
Post a Comment